Flowova vs Eraser: AI Flowchart Tools for Different Users (2026)

Choosing between Flowova and Eraser? Both tools use AI to help create diagrams, but they target different audiences. Eraser is built for engineering teams with a docs-as-code philosophy. Flowova is a general-purpose AI flowchart generator designed for anyone who needs to visualize processes quickly. Here's how they compare.

What is Eraser?

Eraser is a technical documentation and diagramming platform designed specifically for engineering teams. It combines document editing with diagram creation, allowing developers to write technical specs and embed diagrams in the same workspace. Eraser supports creating diagrams from code snippets and natural language, with a strong focus on software architecture, system design, and technical documentation.

What is Flowova?

Flowova is an AI-powered flowchart maker built for speed and simplicity. Describe your process in plain text—or upload a document—and Flowova generates a structured flowchart automatically. It focuses on making flowchart creation accessible to everyone, regardless of technical background.

Feature comparison

Capability	Flowova	Eraser
Target audience	General users	Engineering teams
Creation method	AI text-to-diagram	AI + code-based diagrams
Diagram types	Flowcharts (specialized)	Architecture, sequence, ER
Document integration	Export-focused	Built-in docs workspace
AI features	Core functionality	Core functionality
Document import	PDF, images, text	Limited
Mermaid support	Full import/export	Full support
Collaboration	Share links, comments	Real-time team editing
Learning curve	Very low	Moderate (dev-focused)

Where Flowova wins

Accessibility for non-technical users

Eraser's interface and terminology are optimized for software engineers. Terms like "sequence diagrams," "entity-relationship diagrams," and "system architecture" are second nature to developers but can be intimidating to product managers, marketers, or operations staff.

Flowova uses plain language throughout. You describe a process in everyday terms, and the AI figures out how to represent it visually. There's no need to know diagramming conventions or technical vocabulary.

Speed for simple flowcharts

When you just need a basic process flowchart—onboarding steps, approval workflows, decision trees—Eraser's engineering-focused features are overkill. You're navigating a tool designed for complex technical documentation when you just want to visualize a simple process.

Flowova is streamlined for exactly this use case. Describe your flow, get a diagram, export it. The focused feature set means less cognitive overhead for straightforward flowchart needs.

Document-to-flowchart conversion

Have an existing SOP document, a PDF manual, or scattered notes describing a process? Flowova can ingest these directly and extract the flowchart structure automatically. This is particularly valuable for organizations modernizing their documentation or onboarding new team members.

Eraser expects you to write documentation in their platform rather than importing existing materials.

Simpler pricing

Flowova offers straightforward pricing including a lifetime option ($169 one-time). For individuals or small teams who need occasional flowcharting, this predictability is valuable.

Where Eraser wins

Technical diagram variety

Eraser shines when you need software architecture diagrams, sequence diagrams, entity-relationship diagrams, or cloud architecture visualizations. These diagram types are essential for engineering documentation but outside Flowova's specialization.

If your team regularly creates technical specifications with embedded diagrams, Eraser's integrated approach makes sense.

Docs-as-code workflow

For engineering teams that version-control their documentation alongside code, Eraser fits naturally. Its diagram-in-document model means technical specs stay synchronized with their visual representations.

Flowova focuses on creating and exporting flowcharts rather than maintaining living technical documentation.

Code-to-diagram generation

Eraser can analyze code snippets and generate relevant diagrams—useful for documenting existing systems or understanding unfamiliar codebases. This capability addresses a specific engineering pain point that Flowova doesn't target.

Team collaboration for technical docs

Eraser's real-time collaboration features are designed for engineering teams working on technical specifications together. Multiple developers can edit documents and diagrams simultaneously during design discussions.

Practical example: API request flow

Creating in Eraser:

1. Open new document in engineering workspace
2. Write technical context about the API
3. Use diagram block, describe "API authentication flow with JWT"
4. AI generates sequence diagram
5. Refine with technical details
6. Embed in broader technical specification
7. Share with engineering team for review

Time: 15-20 minutes (including documentation context)

Creating in Flowova:

1. Enter description: "User submits login credentials. Server validates credentials against database. If valid, generate JWT token and return to client. If invalid, return error message. Client stores token for subsequent requests. On each API call, client includes token in header. Server validates token. If expired, prompt re-authentication."
2. Click generate
3. Review output, adjust labels if needed
4. Export as PNG or Mermaid

Time: 5-8 minutes

Both produce usable diagrams. Eraser's output is embedded in technical documentation; Flowova's is a standalone flowchart ready for any context.

Pricing comparison

Flowova:

• Free: Basic AI flowchart generation
• Pro: $10/month or $60/year
• Lifetime: $169 one-time

Eraser:

• Free: Limited usage
• Pro: $10/user/month (billed annually)
• Team: $12/user/month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

For pure flowchart creation, Flowova's pricing is simpler, especially with the lifetime option. Eraser's per-user model scales with team size but includes broader documentation features.

Making the decision

Choose Flowova when:

• You need flowcharts without technical complexity
• Non-engineers will be creating diagrams
• You have existing documents to convert
• Simple, fast flowchart creation is the priority
• You want a tool anyone on the team can use immediately

Choose Eraser when:

• Your team is primarily software engineers
• You need architecture and sequence diagrams
• Technical documentation is integrated with diagrams
• Docs-as-code workflow matters
• You want diagrams embedded in engineering specs

The bottom line

Eraser is an excellent tool for engineering teams who need technical diagrams embedded in their documentation workflow. Flowova is an AI flowchart generator for everyone else.

If you're a developer creating system architecture docs, Eraser's specialized features will feel natural. If you need flowcharts for business processes, onboarding, or general workflow visualization—especially if non-technical team members are involved—Flowova's accessibility and speed are more appropriate.

Different tools for different jobs. Pick based on who's creating the diagrams and what they're documenting.

Try Flowova free

See how fast AI can generate flowcharts from your process descriptions. Start creating with Flowova – no account required for your first flowchart.

Related comparisons

• Flowova vs Flowchart AI – AI flowchart tool comparison
• Flowova vs Flowchart Fun – Text-based flowchart comparison
• Flowova vs Draw.io – Free diagramming comparison
• Flowova vs Figma – Design tool comparison

Related resources

• How to Make a Flowchart – Complete beginner guide
• Explore flowchart templates – Get started with ready-made templates